Follow this link to go to the text only version of nasa.gov
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Follow this link to skip to the main content
+ Contact NASA
Go
ABOUT NASA NEWS AND EVENTS MULTIMEDIA MISSIONS POPULAR TOPICS MyNASA

+ Aeronautics Home
INTEGRATED INTELLIGENT FLIGHT DECK TECHNOLOGIES
ABOUT US
RESEARCH ACTIVITIES
NRA OPPORTUNITIES
OTHER OPPORTUNITIES
PEOPLE
REFERENCE MATERIALS
EVENTS
PARTNERSHIPS
FACILITIES

Related Links
+ Flight Deck Systems
   That Improve Safety

+ Robust Automation-Human
   Systems (RAHS)

+ Displays and Decision Support
+ Operator Performance
+ Operator Characterization and
   Modeling

+ Multi-Modal Interfaces
+ Enabling Avionics
+ Sensing, Signal Processing, and
   Hazrard Characterizations

+ Design Tools
+ Information Interaction Modeling




Aviation Safety: Integrated Intelligent Flight Deck Technologies Banner


RESEARCH ACTIVITIES: OPERATOR PERFORMANCE
Human flight deck functions are defined by safety, social, and economic motivations (Hancock, 1998), and as such they are a unique element of the flight deck system. When considering flight deck systems within the context of the NextGen terminal area, the performance of these functions may be affected by several factors including, for example, physical condition, state of awareness, emotional state, task demands, cognitive demands, and environment and operational context. The inter-relationship of these factors in their manifestation on performance remains largely unknown. Research conducted under the Operator Performance element addresses key unknowns that must be addressed to develop the RAHS (link) and DDS (link) multi-disciplinary concepts.

Communication among humans is a crucial element of NextGen, and therefore designing interfaces that support such information transfer and collaboration, and to defining the roles and responsibilities among teams of operators that afford effective and efficient operations is critical as is the design of collaboration within teams of automated agents and human operators. Therefore OP research seeks to provide. data from empirical research to developers that help enable a “better than visual” capability, a collaborative work environment, and integrated alerting/notification for pilots; that foster the appropriate use of advanced automation and information systems; and that result in robust automation/ human systems for the purpose of trajectory based operations. Developing such guidance will improve situation awareness, workload modulation, and human error resistance and resilience. The appropriate design of technologies to support operator performance requires a concomitant approach to evaluating related human performance constructs. Consequently, this research area also supports concept design development by improving operator performance assessment for conceptual design evaluations at Level 3.


Associate Principal Investigator: Kara Latorella



MORE INFO IN NASA SITE NETWORK

+ USA.gov - The U.S. government's official web portal.
+ Freedom of Information Act
+ Budgets, Strategic Plans and Accountability Reports
+ The President's Management Agenda
+ Privacy Policy and Important Notices
+ Inspector General Hotline
+ Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted Pursuant
to the No Fear Act

+ Information-Dissemination Priorities and Inventories
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Editor: Jessica L. Nowinski
NASA Official: Tony Springer
Last Updated: March 18, 2009
+ Contact NASA