Follow this link to go to the text only version of nasa.gov
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Follow this link to skip to the main content
+ Contact NASA
Go
ABOUT NASA NEWS AND EVENTS MULTIMEDIA MISSIONS POPULAR TOPICS MyNASA

+ Aeronautics Home
INTEGRATED INTELLIGENT FLIGHT DECK TECHNOLOGIES
ABOUT US
RESEARCH ACTIVITIES
NRA OPPORTUNITIES
OTHER OPPORTUNITIES
PEOPLE
REFERENCE MATERIALS
EVENTS
PARTNERSHIPS
FACILITIES

Related Links
+ Flight Deck Systems
   That Improve Safety

+ Robust Automation-Human
   Systems (RAHS)

+ Displays and Decision Support
+ Operator Performance
+ Operator Characterization and
   Modeling

+ Multi-Modal Interfaces
+ Enabling Avionics
+ Sensing, Signal Processing, and
   Hazrard Characterizations

+ Design Tools
+ Information Interaction Modeling




Aviation Safety: Integrated Intelligent Flight Deck Technologies Banner


RESEARCH ACTIVITIES: ROBUST AUTOMATION-HUMAN SYSTEMS
The term automation generally refers to a machine capability to perform functions normally attributed to humans. This research area considers, more specifically, automation that assumes functions that control some aspect of vehicle dynamics and/or operation of vehicle sub-systems. Of critical interest is the well-established tendency for this form of automation to not be robust, but instead limited to specific operating conditions and types of operation, and to a small set of fixed behaviors (i.e. modes). Because the automation cannot be proven to be safe in all potential conditions, the human is typically left responsible for supervising the automation and intervening in the event of any failure or operation outside the ‘designed-for’ operating conditions. Thus, the true robustness of automation can only be evaluated when the joint automation-human system is considered collectively.

Research within the RAHS element applies methods, technology concepts, and operator performance lessons-learned from Level 2 activities to simultaneously design operating procedures and automated functions with particular emphasis on robust automation-human performance. Solutions posited and evaluated consider a range of possibilities from fully automated to partially-automated to perhaps even fully manual methods of flying aircraft along defined 4D paths. Systematic analysis establishes a detailed definition of the flight deck automation functions necessary for the NextGen operational environment. This analysis considers desired automation functions, including those that may not be possible, or practical, within current avionics architectures. A number of operational environments may be considered as well, including, for example, continuous descent arrivals, closely-spaced parallel approaches and departures, metroplex operations, merging and spacing, and low visibility arrivals and departures. These will be largely influenced by close coordination with the ASP-Airspace and Airportal projects and their ConOps developments.


Associate Principal Investigator: Sandy Lozito



MORE INFO IN NASA SITE NETWORK

+ USA.gov - The U.S. government's official web portal.
+ Freedom of Information Act
+ Budgets, Strategic Plans and Accountability Reports
+ The President's Management Agenda
+ Privacy Policy and Important Notices
+ Inspector General Hotline
+ Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted Pursuant
to the No Fear Act

+ Information-Dissemination Priorities and Inventories
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Editor: Jessica L. Nowinski
NASA Official: Tony Springer
Last Updated: March 18, 2009
+ Contact NASA